David J. McAdooCharles E. HudsonV. M. Sadagopa RamanujamM. George
Abstract It is concluded that C 3 H 8 O +˙ formed by dissociation of ionized 2‐ethoxyethanol (8) is a mixture of CH 3 CH 2 OCH 3 +˙ (7) and ˙ CH 2 + OHCH 2 CH 3 (2). Formation of 7 and CH 3 CH 2 + OHCH 3 (12) is attributed to dissociations of species formed by the hydrogen transfers [CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 + ˙ CH 2 OH] → [CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 OCH 3 +˙ CH 2 O] → [CH 3 CH 2 + OHCH 3 HCO ˙ ]. Production of 7 competes weakly with dissociation to CH 3 CH 2 + OCH 2 (13) and to 12. The low abundance of 7 is attributed to the simple dissociation 8 → 13 being both energetically and entropically favored, and a second H‐transfer to give 12 being energetically favored. The threshold for forming 7 is 45 kJ mol −1 above that for dissociation directly to 13, so formation of 7 is the first ion‐neutral complex‐mediated elimination found to have a threshold above that for the competing simple dissociation. The low abundance of 7 also demonstrates that ion–neutral complexes can be intermediates without obviously revealing their presence by direct dissociation. Experimental results suggest that 2 isomerizes to CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OH +˙ (5) and then dissociates by eliminating water. Ab initio results support the feasibility of 2 → CH 3 + OHCH 2 CH 2 ˙ (1) and 2 → 5. However, experimental observations suggest that 2 → 1 does not occur. This is attributed to strong competition from dissociation and isomerization to 5. The transition state for 2 → 5 resembles [CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OH] +˙ , and a cyclic transition state for 2 → 5 is ruled out. When the ethyl‐oxygen bond in 2 is simply lengthened, the charge is initially concentrated on ethyl, but it switches to CH 2 OH in a curve crossing at an apparent transition state for CO bond breaking.
Ahren W. JasperStephen J. KlippensteinLawrence B. Harding
Richard D. BowenAlex W. ColburnPeter J. Derrick
Richard D. BowenAlex W. ColburnPeter J. Derrick
Charles E. HudsonDavid J. McAdoo
Charles E. HudsonDavid J. McAdoo