JOURNAL ARTICLE

Perceived critical distances between F1−F0, F2−F1, F3−F2

Ann K. SyrdalH. S. Gopal

Year: 1983 Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol: 74 (S1)Pages: S88-S89   Publisher: Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

A critical spectral distance of 3 to 3.5 critical bands (bark) between first and second formant frequencies in simplified two-formant synthetic Russian vowels has been reported by Chistovich and her colleagues. Syrdal [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 71, S105 (1982)] transformed fundamental frequency and formant frequency values from naturally produced American English vowels into Bark values from which three distance measures were calculated: F1−F0, F2−F1, and F3−F2. Her proposed auditory-model of vowel perception reduced between-speaker variability and provided a perceptually based quantitatively defined link between some acoustic and phonetic features. In the present series of experiments, several synthetic two-vowel continua were constructed, each with a varying frequency parameter which crossed a critical distance in either of the 3-bark difference dimensions. Critical distances over the 3-bark difference dimensions, estimated by phoneme boundaries calculated from vowel identification tests, will be compared with each other and with previous estimates. Some effects of duration on the phoneme boundary estimates of critical distance will also be discussed. [Work supported by NIH].

Keywords:
Formant Vowel Mathematics Acoustics Critical distance Boundary (topology) Bark (sound) Speech recognition Mathematical analysis Computer science Physics Sound (geography)

Metrics

4
Cited By
0.43
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.62
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Phonetics and Phonology Research
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Speech and Audio Processing
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Signal Processing

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Auditory Distortion Products f2−f1 and 2f1−f2

J. L. Hall

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1972 Vol: 51 (1A_Supplement)Pages: 112-113
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Measurement of the combination tones f2−f1 and 2f1−f2

Patrick M. ZurekBarry Leshowitz

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1976 Vol: 60 (1)Pages: 155-168
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1−f2 and f2−f1

C. FormbyR. M. Sachs

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1980 Vol: 67 (5)Pages: 1754-1758
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Amplitude and phase measurements of combination tones (2f1 − f2) and (f2 − f1)

J. Michael ShipleyJohn W. Matthews

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1974 Vol: 56 (S1)Pages: S45-S45
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why is the 2f1−f2 distortion product maximum at f2/f1≊1.2?

Jont B. Allen

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1992 Vol: 91 (4_Supplement)Pages: 2410-2410
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.