JOURNAL ARTICLE

<title>Comparative analysis of different solutions of light scattering problem for nonspherical particles</title>

Н. В. ВощинниковВ. Б. ИльинR. Stognienko

Year: 1994 Journal:   Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE Vol: 2309 Pages: 89-97   Publisher: SPIE

Abstract

The model of homogeneous spheroids were chosen to provide the detailed comparison of two popular solutions of the light scattering problem: T-Matrix Method and Discrete Dipole Approximation. The exact solution by the Separation of Variables Method were used as a standard giving the most accurate results. We have computed the scattering cross-sections of prolate and oblate spheroids with the refractive index m equals 1.3 and 2.5 at fixed orientation in a wide range of the aspect ratios and sizes. We found that: (1) the coincidence of the T- Matrix Method and the Separation of Variables Method is very good (> 6 - 10 digits) up to some boundary particle size; for larger particles the precision of T-Matrix results sharply drops; (2) the Discrete Dipole Approximation code gives the satisfactory results (the deviations from other methods less 5 - 10%) for large values of size and aspect ratio even if the number of dipoles is 1,000 - 1,500; the accuracy less than 1% may be obtained if the number of dipoles exceed 10,000 - 50,000; (3) the accuracy of the methods decrease with the growth of the parameter (tau) equals m (DOT) (2(pi) rv/(lambda) ) (DOT) (a/b), where rv is the radius of equivolume sphere, (lambda) the wavelength of incident radiation, a/b the aspect ratio. If a/b <EQ 4, the coincidence of the results with those of the Separation of Variables Method is within 1 - 3% for r approximately equals 8 - 16 (Discrete Dipole Approximation) and r approximately equals 50 - 65 (T-Matrix Method). For the particles with a/b >= 10, the Separation of Variables Method is preferable, if 2(pi) rv/(lambda) >= 2 - 3.

Keywords:
Physics Scattering Lambda Discrete dipole approximation Coincidence RADIUS Matrix (chemical analysis) Dipole Mathematical analysis Optics Mathematics Quantum mechanics Materials science

Metrics

4
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.14
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Material Science and Thermodynamics
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Mechanical Engineering
Advanced Scientific Techniques and Applications
Physical Sciences →  Environmental Science →  Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

<title>Light scattering by nonspherical particles: some practical aspects</title>

В. Г. ФарафоновВ. Б. ИльинН. В. ВощинниковM. S. Prokopjeva

Journal:   Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE Year: 2005 Pages: 117-126
JOURNAL ARTICLE

<title>Light scattering by nonspherical particles: some theoretical aspects</title>

В. Г. ФарафоновВ. Б. Ильин

Journal:   Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE Year: 2005 Pages: 109-116
JOURNAL ARTICLE

<title>Light scattering by ensemble of nonspherical particles into solid angles</title>

Л. Е. Парамонов

Journal:   Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE Year: 1994 Vol: 2309 Pages: 349-357
JOURNAL ARTICLE

<title>Light scattering by Brownian particles</title>

Peter P. Maksimyak

Journal:   Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE Year: 2002 Vol: 4607 Pages: 297-305
JOURNAL ARTICLE

<title>Aspects Of Light Scattering By Spherical Particles</title>

L. E. DrainNeil SmithW. D. Dalzell

Journal:   Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE Year: 1983 Vol: 0369 Pages: 610-615
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.