JOURNAL ARTICLE

Differences between native and non-native speakers’ realization of stress-related durational patterns in American English

Yoshiho Shibuya

Year: 1996 Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol: 100 (4_Supplement)Pages: 2725-2725   Publisher: Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between native speakers’ and non-native speakers’ realization of stress-related duration and pitch patterns in English. Anderson-Hsieh et al. [Lang. Learn. 42, 529–555 (1992)] found that prosodic deviance showed a significant negative impact on native speakers’ judgments of non-native pronunciation. Japanese uses pitch to highlight accented syllables; English uses pitch, duration, and loudness. Therefore, it is expected that Japanese speakers use pitch, when speaking English, more than American speakers, but use duration less. Experimental results confirmed this. Three Americans and three Japanese were instructed to read English sentences which included words containing six target vowels, in different stress conditions (reduced, unstressed, and stressed), sentence-medially and -finally. It was found that in American speakers’ utterances, the difference in vowel duration showed constant increase from reduced to stressed. Japanese speakers’ utterances also showed an increase, but the differences among the three stress levels were much smaller than native speakers’. The frequency of the pitch peaks showed the opposite pattern: Japanese speakers showed greater differences than the Americans. These results suggest that Japanese speakers realize English stress using the parameters for realizing pitch accent, leading to less acceptable English speech.

Keywords:
Stress (linguistics) American English Linguistics Duration (music) Vowel Pronunciation Psychology Pitch accent Realization (probability) Vowel length Sentence First language Loudness Stress (linguistics) Audiology Speech recognition Acoustics Mathematics Prosody Computer science Physics Statistics Medicine

Metrics

4
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.12
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Phonetics and Phonology Research
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.