Clustering techniques are widely recommended tools for workload classification. The k-means algorithm is widely accepted as the "standard" technique of detecting workload classes automatically from measurement data. This paper examines validity of the obtained workload classes, when the current system and workload is analyzed by a queueing network model and mean value analysis. Our results, based on one week's accounting data of a VAX 8600, indicate that the results of queueing network analysis are not stable when the classes of workload are constructed through the k-means algorithm. Therefore, we cannot recommended that the most widely used clustering technique should be used in any workload characterization study without careful validation.
Fengbin LiKaterina Goševa-PopstojanovaArun Ross
Md. RasheduzzamanMd. Amirul IslamTasvirul IslamTahmid HossainRashedur M. Rahman
Benjamin M. KniselyJanell S. JoynerMonifa Vaughn-Cooke
James Patton JonesDavid LifkaBill NitzbergTodd Tannenbaum