Abstract

There is an emerging consensus that the nation’s electricity grid is vulnerable to cyber attacks. This vulnerability arises from the increasing reliance on using remote measurements, transmitting them over legacy data networks to system operators who make critical decisions based on available data. Data integrity attacks are a class of cyber attacks that involve a compromise of information that is processed by the grid operator. This information can include meter readings of injected power at remote generators, power flows on transmission lines, and relay states. These data integrity attacks have consequences only when the system operator responds to compromised data by redispatching generation under normal or contingency protocols. These consequences include (a) financial losses from sub-optimal economic dispatch to service loads, (b) robustness/resiliency losses from placing the grid at operating points that are at greater risk from contingencies, and (c) systemic losses resulting from cascading failures induced by poor operational choices. This paper is focused on understanding the connections between grid operational procedures and cyber attacks. We first offer two examples to illustrate how data integrity attacks can cause economic and physical damage by misleading operators into taking inappropriate decisions. We then focus on unobservable data integrity attacks involving power meter data. These are coordinated attacks where the compromised data are consistent with the physics of power flow, and are therefore passed by any bad data detection algorithm. We develop metrics to assess the economic impact of these attacks under re-dispatch decisions using optimal power flow methods. These metrics can be use to prioritize the adoption of appropriate countermeasures including PMU placement, encryption, hardware upgrades, and advance attack detection algorithms.

Keywords:
Computer science Data integrity Computer security Smart grid Robustness (evolution) Grid Economic dispatch Electric power system Cascading failure Vulnerability (computing) Reliability engineering Risk analysis (engineering) Power (physics) Engineering

Metrics

22
Cited By
4.42
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
25
Refs
0.94
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Control and Systems Engineering
Power System Optimization and Stability
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Computer Networks and Communications

Related Documents

© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.