JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adaptive encoding for aerodynamic shape optimization using evolution strategies

Abstract

The evaluation of fluid dynamic properties of various different structures is a computationally very demanding process. This is of particular importance when population based evolutionary algorithms are used for the optimization of aerodynamic structures like wings or turbine blades. Besides choosing algorithms which only need few generations or function evaluations, it is important to reduce the number of object parameters as much as possible. This is usually done by restricting the optimization to certain attributes of the design which are seen as important. By doing so, the freedom for the optimization is restricted to areas of the design space where good solutions are expected. This can be problematic especially if the properties of the design and their interactions are not known sufficiently well like for example for transonic flow conditions. In order to be able to combine the conflicting constraints of a minimal set of parameters and the maximal degree of freedom, we propose an adaptive or growing representation for spline coded structures. In this way, the optimization is started with a simple representation with a minimal description length. The number of describing parameter is adapted during the optimization using a mutation operator working on the structure of the encoding. We compare this method with four different Evolution Strategies using a spline fitting problem as a test function. Of special interest are on the one hand the total number of fitness evaluations, which determine the computational resources necessary for an optimization and on the other hand the final quality of the match measured by the distance between a target curve and the generated spline.

Keywords:
Mathematical optimization Computer science Representation (politics) Aerodynamics CMA-ES Test functions for optimization Evolutionary algorithm Optimization problem Spline (mechanical) Evolution strategy Algorithm Mathematics Multi-swarm optimization Engineering

Metrics

60
Cited By
3.39
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
27
Refs
0.92
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Computational Theory and Mathematics
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence

Related Documents

BOOK-CHAPTER

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Automatic Adaptive Remeshing

Gabriel BugedaEugenio OñateD. Joannas

Notes on numerical fluid mechanics Year: 1997 Pages: 132-151
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Hybridized Differential Evolution

Nateri K. Madavan

Journal:   21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference Year: 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE

STRUCTURAL SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING EVOLUTION STRATEGIES

Manolis PapadrakakisYiannis TsompanakisNikos D. Lagaros

Journal:   Engineering Optimization Year: 1999 Vol: 31 (4)Pages: 515-540
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adaptive response prediction for aerodynamic shape optimization

Leifur LeifssonSławomir Kozieł

Journal:   Engineering Computations Year: 2017 Vol: 34 (5)Pages: 1485-1500
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.