JOURNAL ARTICLE

Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis: A Survey Of Neurology Residents' Knowledge On Current Diagnostic Criteria (P5.194)

Salim ChahinNikitha AshokRaymond R. PriceClyde Markowitz

Year: 2014 Journal:   Neurology Vol: 82 (10_supplement)   Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate neurology residents’ knowledge of current Multiple Sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria. BACKGROUND: The availability of FDA approved treatment for clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and the McDonald criteria have allowed for early diagnosis and treatment of CIS and MS. Introducing the diagnostic criteria during neurology residency can lead to wider adoption and result in earlier diagnosis and improved outcomes. This survey explores residents’ knowledge of the criteria and identifies gaps in knowledge. DESIGN/METHODS: A survey including questions about CIS, the diagnostic criteria and several CIS and MS cases was emailed to neurology residencies in the US. RESULTS: Residents from many program across all training levels participated. Ten percent of residents were not familiar with CIS and 6% were not familiar with the McDonald criteria (majority in junior training levels, p<0.001 & p=0.004 respectively, chi square test). Only 3% and 33% of residents felt the criteria were easy to use and remember, respectively. In the absence of MRI, only 30% of residents diagnosed CIS while a normal MRI led to a greater proportion of CIS diagnosis (80%, p<0.001, marginal homogeneity test ). Eighty three percent and 92% of residents did not treat CIS with no MRI and a normal MRI, respectively. A second clinical attack led to an MS instead of CIS diagnosis (p<0.001) and 98% offered treatment. When the case met McDonald criteria, 78% of residents diagnosed MS and 15% CIS (p<0.001). Ninety seven percent treated Mcdonald MS and 50% treated CIS that met McDonald criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Neurology residents are familiar with McDonald criteria but find it difficult to use and remember. Some were unable to diagnose MS using the criteria and some were hesitant to treat CIS. Better implementation and knowledge of CIS and MS diagnosis during residency can lead to a more successful use of the criteria and improve patient outcomes. Study Supported by: National MS Society - American Brain foundation clinician scientist development award. Disclosure: Dr. Chahin has nothing to disclose. Dr. Ashok has nothing to disclose. Dr. Price has nothing to disclose. Dr. Markowitz has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Inc., Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly & Co., EMD Serono, and Teva Neuroscience as a consultant.

Keywords:
McDonald criteria Medicine Neurology Multiple sclerosis Clinically isolated syndrome Test (biology) Family medicine Diagnostic test Pediatrics Psychiatry

Metrics

0
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.09
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Social Sciences →  Arts and Humanities →  Philosophy
Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Health Sciences →  Health Professions →  General Health Professions
Health, Medicine and Society
Health Sciences →  Health Professions →  General Health Professions

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

THE CURRENT DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Simona PetrescuCristina Panea

Journal:   DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) Year: 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: 2017 McDonald Diagnostic Criteria

Eun Hee SohnSeung-Hae Jeong

Journal:   Journal of the Korean Neurological Association Year: 2018 Vol: 36 (4)Pages: 273-279
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Multiple Sclerosis Diagnostic Criteria

Gary R. CutterMarcus W. Koch

Journal:   Neurology Year: 2021 Vol: 98 (1)Pages: 12-13
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis

Takayuki Tsubaki

Journal:   Elsevier eBooks Year: 2010 Vol: 28 (9)Pages: 378-379
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.